Gasgoo Munich- Aulton New Energy is facing a second major test in the capital markets.
The Hong Kong Stock Exchange recently disclosed that Aulton has resubmitted its listing application. This marks its second attempt after an initial filing in December 2025 expired after six months.
A successful debut would make it the first listed stock in its sector. Yet beneath the glossy exterior lies a persistent financial hemorrhage—the real "stress test" for this IPO.
Revenue Falls for Three Years Straight, Losses Hit the Billions
Since its inception, Aulton has raised roughly 3.5 billion yuan, backed by prominent investors including NIO Capital and funds under Sinopec. Notably, NIO Capital holds a 5.53% stake ahead of the IPO.
Aulton has already carved out a niche in China’s battery-swapping sector.
According to CIC data, Aulton ranks third in China by swapping station operation service revenue in 2025. As of April 30, 2026, its smart energy service platform had connected 531 swapping stations—comprising 214 proprietary stations, 79 under managed operation, and 238 accessed via platform services. The platform serves over 140,000 registered EVs and manages more than 160,000 batteries.
Image Source: Aulton New Energy
Aulton’s proprietary chassis-locking swapping technology reportedly achieves an industry-leading 20-second swap for passenger vehicles. As of April 2026, the company held 2,453 authorized patents nationwide.
Aulton is now undergoing a radical structural shift—a difficult pivot from "swapping equipment seller" to "swapping service provider." Equipment sales were once the core revenue stream, generating 731 million yuan in 2022, or 66.9% of total revenue. But as the industry’s "standard fragmentation" becomes increasingly painful—marked by inconsistent battery specifications across automakers, poor cross-platform compatibility, and high customization costs—equipment sales have withered. Between 2023 and 2025, revenue from equipment sales plunged from 519 million yuan to 150 million yuan, a cumulative drop of 71.1%.
That pivot is reflected directly in the top line. From 2023 to 2025, Aulton’s revenue fell from 1.155 billion yuan to 926 million yuan, and then to 677 million yuan—a three-year cumulative decline of 35.2%.
Even more concerning is the prolonged absence of profitability. The company recorded gross losses for three consecutive years from 2023 to 2025, totaling 39.85 million yuan, 34.1 million yuan, and 33.89 million yuan respectively. It wasn’t until the first four months of 2026 that the gross margin turned positive for the first time, hitting 1.8%. However, this improvement was driven largely by higher margins in equipment sales and entrusted operation services (which boast a 58.4% gross margin), while the core proprietary station business still suffers a steep gross loss margin of 18.6%.
On the bottom line, net losses came in at 655 million yuan, 419 million yuan, and 307 million yuan for 2023 through 2025. That amounts to a cumulative deficit of 1.382 billion yuan over three years.
The flip side of shrinking scale is severe idle capacity. Utilization rates for swapping station production lines fell from 57.9% to 20.4% between 2023 and 2025, while swapping module line utilization dropped from 77.4% to 21.5%. In the first four months of 2026, those rates slid further to 9.2% and 17.5%, respectively.
Shrinking to Survive, But the Road Remains Rocky
Faced with continuous financial bleeding, Aulton’s strategy is one of subtraction.
The most visible change is in the scale of its proprietary stations. Aulton operated 321 self-run stations at the end of 2023; that number fell to 291 by the end of 2024, then to 236 by the end of 2025, and finally to just 214 by the end of April 2026. Meanwhile, capital expenditure plummeted from 144 million yuan in 2025 to just 5.8 million yuan in the first four months of 2026.
It is clear that Aulton is actively closing or transferring underperforming sites. While this depresses short-term revenue, it reduces outlays for depreciation, rent, and maintenance.
This "asset-light" transition began to show results in 2026: operating cash flow swung from a net outflow of 55.2 million yuan to a net inflow of 10.9 million yuan in the first four months. Yet financial pressure is far from relieved. By the end of April, the company held only 298 million yuan in cash and equivalents, alongside a net current liability of 88.1 million yuan. Net trade receivables reached 195 million yuan, of which only about 14% had been collected by the end of May. The prospectus frankly concedes that a net loss is still expected for the full year of 2026.
Image Source: Aulton New Energy
A greater challenge comes from the squeeze of industry dynamics. Aulton’s swapping services rely heavily on commercial vehicles like taxis and ride-hailing cars, while penetration in the private passenger vehicle market remains minimal—leaving the company with a narrow range of application scenarios.
In the commercial vehicle sector, automakers like NIO and ZEEKR are building their own exclusive swapping networks, while players like BYD are aggressively deploying high-power supercharging technology. As of July 2026, NIO operated nearly 3,900 swapping stations compared to Aulton’s connected 531—a vast disparity in scale. At the same time, the rapid proliferation of 800V high-voltage supercharging is eroding private car owners' reliance on the speed advantage of swapping.
The swapping ecosystem has now consolidated into three camps: the automaker camp represented by NIO, the battery giant camp represented by CATL, and the independent third-party camp represented by Aulton.
While the first two camps focus on building brand moats or controlling underlying standards, the core competitiveness of third-party service providers lies in cross-brand compatibility. But the price of "neutrality" is the lack of subsidies from vehicle profits—meaning the company must shoulder the investment cost for every single station on its own.
Aulton’s second filing carries a burden that extends beyond mere fundraising—it is about using external capital to support a business restructuring and buying more time for its asset-light service model to pay off. The crown of "HKEX’s first battery-swapping stock" is certainly alluring. But before it can be worn, the market needs clarity on one critical question: can this company find a viable path to profitability in a sector surrounded by giants?
